In my
last post in this series, I talked about what I'd learned about submitting work from the "other side of the table", running a call for entry. In that post, I spoke in general terms. With her gracious permission, in this post I'm going to share the process Mary Foyes and I went through to include her piece.
 |
| Mary's family photo of the veil she created for her daughter |
It all started with a Facebook message asking if I'd be interested in including a freeform peyote first holy communion veil in my
book. Mary wasn't sure if I'd be interested because it wasn't 'jewelry', but sent a picture along, just in case. That fact that it wasn't typical jewelry intrigued me, so I wrote back and asked if she had any other photos of the veil itself.
She promised to send some additional pictures that evening.

While these photos would likely be fine for personal use, there was no way I could use them in my book. Mary's greatest concern was that I wouldn't be interested in her work because this was a 'beginner' piece. That concerned me
far less than the issues with the fuzzy carpet and the yellow color cast (not to mention file size, slight blurriness and image resolution issues).
I liked that it was a wonderfully approachable example of 'thinking outside the box' in terms of what you can use bead weaving for. Beyond that, it was one of only a couple of submissions I'd received that were stitched along the width (a less common technique than stitching along the length).
At this point I knew that I wanted to include Mary's veil, but couldn't use the photos I'd received.
A side note here; I'm not a major publisher, with a streamlined submission process receiving hundreds of submissions. Rather, I see myself as first and foremost an advocate for freeform peyote and for the other artists working in the field. So I put on my thinking cap to come up with ways I could help her improve her photography.
After a morning's research, I put together my next email. I'm including the text here so you can see my process:
"I need high quality shots of your bead work on a completely neutral or
complimentary background. By complimentary, I mean something that seems
to fit with the idea of First Holy Communion (think white, gold, soft lace, old prayer books, etc.) Alternately, you could take the
shots on a live model, or even a larger doll if you wanted, but be
careful of the backgrounds even then.
I just did a little research on Etsy, and here's a shop that might give you some ideas:
Made4YouBoutique, This
listing shows a nice example of using a large doll as a model.
I really like the background in this
listing. The background is in such soft focus it becomes simply a color wash, but you'd need to make sure the beads are in crisp
focus. This is a depth of field issue, if your niece is a camera aficionado.
In this
listing,
I like the headband shown against the decorative paper backgrounds. A
trick I've learned when using decorative paper as a background - it the
print seems too strong for a background, cover it with a layer or two of
tissue to soften it. Does that make sense? I am not as fond of the
wood backgrounds as they don't seem to say anything about the piece.
Here's
a shot from a different store (
ButterCreamDolls), on a real little girl.
And I like this
shot from a third shop. Also on a real girl, The focus is very much on the
veil. I could see your freeform band showing up beautifully in a shot
like this. And your daughter might enjoy having such a shot for her scrapbook,
too.
I highly recommend using Etsy,
Pinterest or other sites heavy on photography to get ideas for how to
set up your photo shoots. Look at background, lighting, how they
display their items and which seem most appealing to you.
I'd like both some closeup (detail) shots, and a shot or two from a
greater distance showing more of the veil and giving me room to crop the
photo as necessary to fit my page layout. Because the focus here is
your freeform, the flower at the back of the veil isn't as important,
but it's nice to see some portion of the veil itself to make it clear
what it is."
Mary promised me new photos. A couple of weeks later, these are what I received:
 |
| photography by Shauna Ploeger, Photography Du Jour |
 |
| photography by Shauna Ploeger, Photography Du Jour |
 |
| photography by Shauna Ploeger, Photography Du Jour |
Mary decided to work with a professional photographer,
Shauna Ploeger, of Photography Du Jour. Shauna took a number of different shots, of which I've included three. Gorgeous! I loved that she included both horizontal and vertical versions of each shot. This gave me tremendous flexibility when it came to page layout and design.
If you choose to use a professional photography, make sure that they know how you plan to use the photos! It is very important that you get the
proper licensing if you plan to submit photographs for possible publication. As a publisher, I need to be able to use the images in a variety of
ways, and I need to not have to worry about photographers becoming
understandably irate over unauthorized usage of their work.
My artist agreement contract states that "Artist grants Author a non-exclusive, non-transferrable license to use the photographic representations of the Artist’s Work(s) provided by the Artist, in print and digital formats in relation to the publication of Explorations in Freeform Peyote Beading, referred to hereafter as the Book, including publicity and promotional materials including but not limited to websites, press releases, blog posts, posters, point of sale displays, postcards, etc. related to the book." This is a fairly standard publishing clause. When working with a professional photographer, make sure you have the license necessary to grant these permissions. Get it in writing. You may have to pay more for this license.
Whether you plan to photograph your work yourself, or hire
someone to do so, researching background and display options will give
you a better understanding of what you'd like the final photographic
product to look like. Back when I worked as a gallery owner, an artist
once commented that his slides were more important than his actual work,
because the slides were what he'd be judged on for shows, grants and
almost all other professional opportunities. That shocked me at the
time, but I'm coming to understand what he meant. The photographic
records of your work can be almost as important as the works themselves,
depending upon what you hope to do.
As solo artists, we wear so many hats! Artist, photographer, personal publicity manager - each with its separate set of skills and proficiencies.